I believe Giesler And you have different Ideas for the Definition of Anarchy. Anarchy is Lawlessness without even morality. Modern Anarchists have altered that perception to Voluntarily Living without Laws but voluntarily with a set of basic Judeo-Christian Morals. I’ve often said to do so then you must change what you call it..... Ie Agorism. Not Anarchy. Kids these days are trying to change the definition. Imho.
If you take the word be its roots all it means is "without rulers." I don't think I'm the one changing the definition ;)
I have a definition from Blacks Law in 1951 and one today. They’ve changed the “offficial” meaning. Also it’s the definition I was taught in Middle school. The absence of the rule of law. But my civics teacher was interesting. I must have had a Sovereign Citizen as a civics teacher in Middle School back in the day. I remember discussing anarchy and he referred to Anarchism as the State in which Sovereigns interact without government or laws or codes or even rules and no hierarchy of Authority. Pure Fantastic Freedom.