As an anarcho-capitalist/libertarian I find group think/tribal mentality insulting, damaging, and degrading. It's this mental slavery that plagues the world, the dumbing down of society by punishing critical thought while promoting memorization of trivial "facts", and the numbing of our senses to injustice by promoting it as common place. The winners write the history books. They rob their victims of their voice, and they control the information you intake daily, the news and entertainment you ingest, controlling the masses through fear. As your anxiety levels rise so does your hopelessness, thus leading to your willingness to find a "savior" whether that man be liberal, conservative, or in between, a god, a devil, or a lost love, you have given up dependence on yourself in search of a deity to rely upon for your wellbeing. Break these chains, this mental disorder, this programming, conditioning, brainwashing, or whatever you want to call it, and be free from their power.
I know to most people personal responsibility and self ownership is a terrible philosophy. It's insane to believe that a man can actually do something for himself and his family without anybody's assistance. Individualism threatens the very fabrics of what you believe, but let's really think about things logically for just a moment.
America once had a government system so small it was barely identifiable, now has one of the biggest governments in the world. Its citizens are no longer free, but slaves to a corporate run government. The masters have become the slaves to a ruling class of elites. Though the change was in place prior to 1913, the privatizing of the currency to a globalist monopoly ended the origins of this nation, and through careful manipulation of language the masses live under an illusion of freedom. A term which today means one group's thought(s) must force others to submit and abandon theirs. This is not subject only to liberals, though they are the kings of character defamation, their preferred tactic for lack of logic and morals, but "conservatives" (the majority of which are national socialists without even knowing it) preaching law through morality, patriotism, war, and less taxes (less theft is somehow more noble and moral). If someone wants something these moral Nazis don't agree with, prostitution - a profession in which a person uses their own possession for profit, or prohibition which states owning or distribution of a plant is illegal.... how can you trust God if you make nature illegal... paranoid much... I say while we're at it we outlaw fruit bearing trees because of the Garden of Eden scandal. So, statists of all kinds wish to elect, through their majority rule mentality, people into power to rob you of your rights. SJW's push their fucking bullshit censorship under the disguise of political correctness and trigger warnings (seems like another way to go after guns if you ask me. Trigger warning vilifies a piece of a tool. It's like saying you're about to get shot with words. It implies what is about to be said will harm you in some way. Hey, sticks and stones you libtard pussies.) trying to manipulate and control you through their feelings, and when you refuse they call you racists, bigots, sexists, or any amount of ists in the attempt to silence you. Moral Nazis on the other hand try to police your actions, gay marriage is wrong, anal sex is wrong, drugs are wrong, nudity is wrong, drinking on Sunday is wrong, sex for money is wrong (it's somehow morally superior to be a slut rather than a whore), and if you don't like their moral damnation they want government to kidnap you at gunpoint and throw you in a cage. It strikes me odd that it's so socially acceptable to argue which statist views are more moral or principled when both strike me as morally bankrupt. How is robbing people of life, liberty, and property because you personally disagree with them moral or principled in any way? Under the Nonagression Principle, NAP, you may not rob anybody of life, liberty, and property. If you disregard NAP, then you are dealt with in a manner that matches your crime against another's life liberty and property. It's complete liberty and equality across the board. No elected criminal is above the law forcing their will on you at the threat of harming you in some way. I guess the concept seems radical to those that need a state to breast feed them all their life.
In my estimation, as you sit there disgusted that someone is so destructive and hateful to believe these things, when you lift the oppressive security of the state from your life, and only punish those that commit violent offenses against someone, you don't under regulate, but open the opportunities of people's minds and ability to overcome. Evolution has taught us that humans adapt very well to any circumstance. You can look up the facts on how welfare has hurt the poor, how gun confiscation doesn't rid us of criminals, but only creates more victims, and how the war on drugs has only increased the amount of drug related crimes as opposed to getting drugs off the streets. Do us all a favor, next time you think you know what's best for another man's life imagine which of your "rights" you're gonna lose because of the tyrant that man votes into power as a reaction to the privilege he lost. Government does not own "rights" or freedom. It is not their's to give. Regulations, while making the weak minded and lazy feel more secure, rob others of individual liberty. Every time you vote, recognizing a group's authority, you are submitting to the fear of a mafia style racket that terrorizes people that disagree with it, that extorts the hard working men and women of the world, and that locks up millions of people each year for victimless "crimes" because their control over you is more important than anything else in their minds. Take back control. Be free. Is it your life, or their's?
I may have a terrible philosophy, but I'm not a tyrant threatening you if you don't do as I say. That's your government. That's your god. That's you.
Agree
Thanks for reading