I disagree with ancoms on everything and with ancaps on two FUNDAMENTAL issues:

1. Many of them advocate private states, private law, private mercernaries, private jugdes. I dont give a shit who you give your resources to, but if you wanna enforce your ''private laws'' on me, your a statist, of the facist variety.

2. LAND CANNOT BE PRIVATELY OWNED ONLY POSSESSED.
   Ancaps, If one advocates using violence to control land you do not use, it allows for the monopolization of land, which i believe is the origin of the state. it makes it hypothetically possible for one human being or one corporation to control all the land, and all human activities depend on land. There fore in a private land society the renters are slaves to the parasite landlords class, in the past we called it fuedalism.

Think about it, every human has the right to grow his food and build his own house, but in ancapistan all land (including free/unused land) is monopolized and he who owns it can demand thousands of dollars per square meters, just like it is done today.

Pure Anarchism does not define detials of economic and conflict resolution it merely apposes all sources of authority. Therefore i have come to identify with individualist anarchism (not egoist) to emphasis that i oppose both ancoms and ancaps.

As for ancoms, they oppose Private capital as if it were evil, capital is anything that can create more things, so a scizzors, a hammer, a sewing machine are capital that anyone has the right to own, even rent if they want. But if one uses their brain, land cannot fit in this category of property. first of all the earth was before all of us, no one put in labor to create the planet. We came afterwards. As tridimensional beings we require a 3d space to exist which since being land mammals and we require land just to survive.