many ancaps and mutualists do advocate this, not all, but some. Hopefully it will be a downward trend. they cal it private tender law, private militias, which is fine to defend one selfelf or others but not for a market based law system. its just a another form of cracy, not democracy but marketcracy.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Show me where any AnCap defends a legal system not based exclusively on private property.
You can do your own research. I have no obligation to provide it for you but i will do so anyway.
An ANCAP creates a ANARCHOCAPITALIST FAQ and explains private law: http://ozarkia.net/bill/anarchism/faq.html
quote: "Imagine a society with no government. Individuals purchase law enforcement from private firms. Each such firm faces possible conflicts with other firms. Private policemen working for the enforcement agency that I employ may track down the burglar who stole my property only to discover, when they try to arrest him, that he too employs an enforcement agency.
http://lionsofliberty.com/2012/08/22/intro-to-ancap-private-law-pt-1-the-case-against-monopoly/
etc
Right, and none of this supports your initial claim, as I have pointed out. Nobody said you have awn obligation, to do anything. Thanks for the comment.
Might i add that the law enforcement purchased is not limited to his home or land but outside. It states that conflict resolution anywhere is settled this way. A kind of ebay statism