Perhaps you should explore options that don't account for things in terms of dollars and cents.
https://steemit.com/books/@freebornsociety/and-then-there-were-none-by-eric-russell
https://steemit.com/books/@freebornangel/looking-backwards-by-ed-bellamy
As long as money exists the haves will rule the have nots by enforcing poverty upon them.
I'm quite familiar with communism, but you already know that. I just don't think it is a perfect solution either. Every communist society (and Russia, Cuba, et al. were NOT communist), has had hierarchy. I'm thinking about primitive communism, Madagascar when the gov't withdrew, etc. All of those communist societies had hierarchies, which basically were functionally isomorphic to disparities of wealth. The shaman and the chief end up with better standards of living than the average person, even when money does not enter the equation. I've worked in anarchistic groups, with consensus and free association, and hierarchy develops there too, even when there is no money and no formal hierarchy. A charismatic or popular person ends up becoming an informal leader and gets the privileges that come along with popularity. William Gillis talks alot about this phenomenon.
Also, I specifically advocate alternative monetary systems in which disparities of wealth are impossible. For instance, I propose a crypto-currency monetary system integrated with a land registry on the blockchain, where wealth will be automatically be taxed, to prohibit accumulation, and redistributed out as a basic income. If there is progressive taxation, land value tax, and corporate tax, within a socialist society in which the community has partial ownership of all land and industry, and all people are provided with a universal basic income....then there won't be any distinction between "haves" and "have nots".
Yep, I don't know how to keep folks from following leaders with it's associated problems.
Ending rule by force is the main thing, then we can experiment.
I do like the new slant on things coming from you.
I was thinking about a similar concept - a cryptocurrency system where ICO proceeds are used to buy land. Then land owned by Foundation can be rented out while currency tokens will be subject to demurrage. The rent and demurrage fee should be used to pay basic income to all participants.
Interesting idea. I'd like to hear more. You should do a post on the subject.
Thanks. I have drafted a chart of how this system may be designed. I will do a post once I will have it finalized.