I think that property is not violence, as violence is the tool with which you protect your property. This tool may never be needed, therefore it is not the defining characteristic of property, from my view.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Agreed. I think ancoms and other leftists try to portray property as violence as if it were an aggression against them when the overwhelming majority of property has been acquired justly. It is still representative of both what you can earn and defend (or police defend on your behalf).