So you're saying we bring the pre-Obamacare model of US health insurance into every aspect of life? Because that was such a good system! Voluntary insurance for police protection. If you're in tge process of being attacked, the police won't literally check your insurance card before stopping the attack. They'll protect you anyway, just like an American emergency room. So what happens when they find out that you don't have insurance AND you don't have money? Then everybody else has to pick up the tab.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The pre obamacare model of insurance is state mandated monopolies which insurance companies were given exclusive rights over a state. Those insurance companies were all owned by banks. Since then... nothing has changed except now you are mandated by law to purchase from them. There is nothing voluntary in that at all. Why does an insurance based program have to be solely operated by licensed insurance agents and why can't insurance based models be built into public and private trusts which cannot be raided to pay for Peter for debts incurred by Paul? (The Social Security Fund Fraud)
Oh right, I forgot that I promised myself years ago to stop arguing with anarchists. I'll show myself out and let you throw your soundbites at someone else.
Have a nice crusade!
Did roads exist before the income tax? Yes. Why? Farmers built roads to move product to town.
Were there roads when the natives lived in America? Yes. Did they tax people? No.
I bet North America (north of Aztec lands) didn't have any roads bigger than a footpath. It doesn't take capital to "build" a footpath - you just walk on it and chop up trees that fall down on it.
Nice argument! You've convinced me that if we abolish the government, thank god we'll at least get to keep our footpaths.
Actually, here's a serious question: where did you get the idea that roads came before taxes? It seems to me that roads (I mean real roads, the kind that need construction and capital) historically only show up when you have organized civilizations, and I can't think of a civilization that didn't have some form of taxes.
There is a walmart over there. There is your house right there. Both of you will stand there shaking your heads and no trade will ever take place.
That may have been a logical conclusion during the times of witch hunting and slave trade where empires burnt to the ground at the hands of barbarians.
All old roads were trails made by animal and human migration in origin. Militaries later upgraded the roads to better transport troops. This was long before transportation was fast and efficient where someone could hop on a plane and be anywhere in a day. As technology continues to advance the old systems of road management should as well. If you seriously think I would not fix the road leading to my business so customers can easily travel there while my competitor does, you mistake the power of the market. As important as a store's roof is the parking and throughway available to accommodate traffic. Do you really think that freight trucking would not ensure safe and easy access to distribute goods? Plus you seem to be avoiding at talking about the fact that the current designs for roads made from tar can be effectively replaced by roads made from self repairing concrete. This would also reduce the cost of bridges. Concrete lasts 100 times longer to wear against those systems and structurally it will hold up much longer with this self repairing concrete technology. So instead of there being a trillion dollar issue in the USA at the moment it could be effectively paid for in a few billion dollars. Far more can be spent on new roads than repairing the old. I am not for ending roads... I am for looking at how roads are built and bringing us into the 21st century and out of the 18th century. Besides... every wonder why a Model T can drive through anything and current automobiles hit one pothole and need thousands in repairs? Im sure it has nothing to do with the taxpayer bailing out failed business models...
You didn't answer my question. At all.
You really didn't even pretend to answer my question.
You just started in on a self-inconsistent rant.
This is why I don't argue with anarchists.