@stellabelle, I beg to disagree with you...
I read some of msgivings' writings and I see no evidence for them being AI generated. While AI has advanced to the level of writing weather reports, financial reports and such, even creating scientific hypotheses, it is not capable of producing Steemit blog posts consisting of pictures with prose that can appeal to humans.
I read your well written article article above and I am not convinced that @msgivings' articles are composed by AI; AI assisted perhaps, but not AI.
I heartily encourage you to rip apart my arguments and make a fool of me because that would mean that AI has evolved to a point that gives me great hope because now machine learning will soon digest the world's scientific/technological data and advance it in an exponentially accelerating fashion as dipicted in The Singularity by Ray Kurzweil.
Madam, I respectfully and metaphorically throw down my gauntlet!
Artificial intelligence has fooled you. The singularity has begun, my dear.
I read yogi.artist's post and am still not convinced. Getting to the bottom of this is going to take some time, but you have brought up an important question about AI: Can AI writing fool the public? This is something worth examining.
I read a year or so ago that a computer passed the "Turing Test", but that was even a little controversial. Furthermore, I have posted to the Google+ AI Community about this and hope to get some knowledgable answers.
In the mean time, I am still researching this matter...
Indeed it has, just like it's evil overlords who it will soon consume.
ha ha! I remember when you broke your @mstakings errr.....@msgivings story, that was one of the highlights on Steemit. A giant veil of ignorance was lifted.......and the evil overlords.....who exactly are they???????
The evil overlords are the the "deceptive human mind's who are controlling them"
you obviously didn't read @yogi-artist's post:
This is an excerpt from his post that details how he used AI to generate the entire post:
"This 750 word+ blog, that passes copyscape, was generated in 20 seconds using the latest and most advanced automated content writing AI software. It is totally original and un-edited. All I did was typed in my title, clicked generate, and within less time than it takes to put the kettle on, this is what it produced - :
"Appearances are frequently deceptive. Physical appearance is not really important, cetainly not as crucial as character.
When most standards think about the attitude or mood of someone based on their inner or inside look, attitude might be considered part of outer beauty as it adds to or subtracts from the physical look of the individual, and is also a way to learn more about the inner attributes of that specific individual. They're permanent in nature. I'm sure that everybody has things which they don't like about themselves, whether it's their physical appearance, part of the personality, or many other facets of self.
Inner beauty makes it possible to appreciate outer beauty. Always keep in mind that your inner beauty is more significant than your outside looks. External physical beauty alone won't direct you towards connecting with people emotionally.
The physical overall look of humans is what we call the external look, whilst spirituality is really a kind of internal look. Makeup that's properly applied can dramatically enhance your outward look. Self-esteem is a key value within the life of any human being. Quite simply, an unattractive person will obtain a significant value contingent upon their inside overall look.
By the end of it, you hate yourself, you're self-conscious, you're questioning your look and way of life, and doubting your self-worth. Your physical appearance - Let's face it, it's the first thing an expected mate or date sees. Importantly, you must be the kind of person who, irrespective of appearance and outward perception, never allows anybody to make you feel inferior...."
read the rest of this AI-generated post here: https://steemit.com/steem/@yogi.artist/the-importance-of-physical-appearance-in-society-featuring-new-ai-author-mstakings
https://automatedinsights.com/product
The major news outlets are already using AI to generate stories, articles and breaking news updates.
While those examples demonstrate effective AI uses, they are really templates where you plug in the data. For example, a corporate 10K report is a fairly routine matter; just fill in fiscal year, revenues, expenses etc. and you can get a real human readable report. But, putting 750 words free form as in an article is still beyond the scope of AI faccording to my research. I am open minded, but AI doing Steemit posts for profit is too good to be true! But, it is an interesting April Fool joke...
yeah. but as i said in my latest article, sometimes you can't change people minds and that's OK!
I do not believe in A.I generated content. It can be true but it wouldn't be rewarded anywhere else...even here, someone writing from a.i generated is still at disadvantage.
IDEAS are what makes a mind spark, A.I has none becaue...let's fucking stop calling it AI!!! it's not an "I" :))