You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Artificial Intelligence Has Made $16,000+ In Blogging Rewards. What Is The Future of AI on Steemit?

in #ai8 years ago

I found myself wondering this as well, @nubchai. Whether or not @msgivings was writing easy rants as a bot or not, I think that what was perceived as "quality" in them was more like attitude. Remember Tay, the Microsoft bot who started saying incendiary things after people intentionally messed with it? Some of those tweets were shockingly hilarious. While it's true that there are memes and jokes that do well on Steemit and should not be prevented from doing so, I have to ask:

Is a rant with a strong attitude worth so much?

Should we all stop bothering to do research or open up and just flame our most controversial opinions? Is that really adding value? Is that what Steemit wants to be?

Before they trended, I commented on a few of those posts trying to inspire her(him?) to increase the power of unsupported opinion with a rounded view, references to books, personal confessional stories etc. I honestly thought they would need that to do well. (I haven't read all the posts, so maybe some are better than the ones I commented on). But...No response. AND serious success.

I know it's a different case, but when @lukestokes asked @sean-king to support a claim, @sean-king wrote a whole article supporting the claim. That's what community that values quality looks like. Even though @sean-king is well-known here and doesn't need to improve his writing or argumentation to be rewarded for what are often deeply impressive articles, he engages with challenges. I'm not saying that everybody should have to respond to every comment, but it builds community whenever anyone does. Those who are here as parasites to get what they can and run are unlikely to be contributing as citizens. I admit it gets my goat that someone who showed little interest in being a real person on Steemit was so consistently and overwhelmingly rewarded, whether or not their writing was generated by a bot.

Sort:  

I agree. I think the AI creation of "content" is less of an issue than the consistent upvoting of suspect posts by people with a LOT of steem powere and their bots.

I totally agree, @nubchai. Thanks for responding. :)