And this Harper's article by Jonathan Lethem veers into science on page 9.
http://harpers.org/archive/2007/02/the-ecstasy-of-influence/
'Artists and intellectuals despondent over the prospects for originality can take heart from a phenomenon identified about twenty years ago by Don Swanson, a library scientist at the University of Chicago. He called it “undiscovered public knowledge.” Swanson showed that standing problems in medical research may be significantly addressed, perhaps even solved, simply by systematically surveying the scientific literature. Left to its own devices, research tends to become more specialized and abstracted from the real-world problems that motivated it and to which it remains relevant. This suggests that such a problem may be tackled effectively not by commissioning more research but by assuming that most or all of the solution can already be found in various scientific journals, waiting to be assembled by someone willing to read across specialties. Swanson himself did this in the case of Raynaud’s syndrome, a disease that causes the fingers of young women to become numb. His finding is especially striking — perhaps even scandalous — because it happened in the ever-expanding biomedical sciences.'
So true!!! Yes, but but this "someone" will really have a hard time. Imagine he/she need to have a little knowledge here and there to assemble everything. not easy...
Right, which was why I mentioned the librarians as team members, who would presumably be able to ask their team experts about the things they found trolling the literature. Or maybe the scientist in question just happens to be one of those people who always think in terms of synthesis, which is not really a recognized skill set in academia, but an important one (in my opinion, since that's how I think).
Very interesting. Indeed, scientists, being scientists, are highly specialised in their fields and may neglect other aspects. And so, getting librarians who are interested in the knowledge nd want to synthesize knowledge can be the one to assemble this.
As a non-woman sufferer of Raynaud's, I resent the implication that only women are subject to this phenomenon.
On behalf of Jonathan Lethem -- who wrote the article, and whom I do not know -- sorry, his bad.