Right, which was why I mentioned the librarians as team members, who would presumably be able to ask their team experts about the things they found trolling the literature. Or maybe the scientist in question just happens to be one of those people who always think in terms of synthesis, which is not really a recognized skill set in academia, but an important one (in my opinion, since that's how I think).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Very interesting. Indeed, scientists, being scientists, are highly specialised in their fields and may neglect other aspects. And so, getting librarians who are interested in the knowledge nd want to synthesize knowledge can be the one to assemble this.