You are completely ignoring that those 'greedy users' are those that get the most rewards: the whales. Not just @haejin, who became a whale using the very tactics the whales are using to maintain their control of the rewards pool.
"...some people let GREED rule their actions. So they give only what will benefit them or their friends."
The whales.
@haejin should be your HERO, who has forced the whales to give up 5% of 'their' rewards pool to a minnow. He should be an example of how to democratize the rewards doled out on this platform, so that the 1% aren't getting 99% of rewards here.
Do the math. The whales get 99% of rewards, leaving ALL the minnows 1% to share amongst us. The median payout is .01 SBD. @haejin's rewards are maximally 5% of the pool. That decreases the ROI of the 35 whales by 5% (our 1% is negligible to them).
Were @haejin to quit posting, that 5% would return to the pool, where the whales would take 99% of it (or do you expect them to dole it out to minnows in a completely new program of upvoting minnows?), leaving 1% of 5% of rewards to be shared amongst the tens of thousands of minnows.
1% times 5% is .2%. How much does that affect your rewards?
None. You won't even notice. The median payout is .01 SBD. How much is .2% of .01?
Zero, +/- a rounding error--that is how much @haejin is affecting you, while forcing the whales to share the rewards pool with a minnow - he came up from nothing.
Thimk.
You know nothing of what I am and am not ignoring.
@haejin is the abuser that is being handled at the moment.
After this situation has been righted, more problems will be addressed.
And Steemit members with 5000 SP or less are getting more than 1%, sorry. Whatever calculation or post you read that said that was wrong, old or biased.
Thanks for contributing solutions and not just whining and being a negative nelly.
Please share your data.
I'd love to be wrong about that.
My data begins several months ago, and I have been attentive to such posts as I saw regarding the matter, without seeing any indication that the situation had improved. Here's a chart from just prior to HF19:
I showed you mine. Please show me yours.
Where does the chart say 99% or 1% or anything? It gives no percentages.
And from 4 months ago... who knows. But Fulltimegeek's stewards of gondor initiative alone it had to have made a difference of more than 1% straight up transfer into minnows accounts. SOG only ended(was suspended) 12 days ago. Payouts for the last of their effect just finished maturing 5 days ago.
Show me recent data. You made the claim. Show me yours.
I asked @fulltimegeek or @abh12345 (don't remember which) if they had any data regarding the impact of the delegation effort, which I totally and completely support to this day.
I don't recall a response with data coming from that query.
I have repeatedly, as I stated, requested a similar chart
of recent data from @arcange, and not received one.
I am not competent to troll the blockchain for the raw data.
I responded to your statement that 'folks with under 5k SP get more than 1% of rewards.'
The chart very obviously shows that the vast majority of Steem, over 99%, is attained by a handful of accounts.
It is dated, but I have not been able to get new data.
You made the claim that I was not correct, and I supported my claim with data.
Either support your claim with data, or fail to support your claim.
That's how it works.
Science!
To the facts:
(sorry, opinion here: YOU have wasted my time. You portend that you are a facts person that cares not for money or its value on this platform, and yet mostly only posted pseudo-facts. Even your use of Haejin upvoting you does not DISPROVE my assertion that he has helped/upvoted minnows 1%. 10 -100% upvotes everyday for 100 days vs 1 ??? % upvote to one minnow to negate a flag. Doesn't make his contribution greater than 1%.)