You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: When One is Above All LAWS in STEEMIT

in #abuse7 years ago

I don't know why @stellabelle @transisto @pfunk and other are Supporting this account @littleboy.

Thanks for the concise report, you almost make me want to delegate to him.

I think people are more than allowed to self upvote themselves when they write something they think they should be rewarded for or that they think should get more attention.

When One is Above All LAWS in STEEMIT .

Nobody is above the law on STEEM. (not steemit)

I won't answer any of your concern beyond that and let @littleboy speak for himself.

Sort:  

I ran a query with steemsql. It shows @littleboy gave more than 53.8% of all his voting weights to himself.

Screen Shot 2017-11-29 at 10.41.42 AM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-29 at 10.48.23 AM.png

I believe it's ok for minnows to upvote themselves. But more than 50% is too much. This guy is very funny. 😂😂😂

This is my voting report:

Also, I will gradly unvote my posts if someone compensated me for 150$+ USD worth rewards lost due to downvotes from scammer zeartul.

A significant portion of my SP is used to downvote. Which you didn't take into account I assume.

I did not realized you downvoted so much. I checked the data and after including downvotes, you gave 23% upvotes to yourself. It's not too bad.

I am hijacking this comment section since it is in the top. Writing in response to @bullionstackers' post.

First of all, thanks for making this report. It had the opposite effect of what you intended. My free delegation increased from 30000 to 32500 after your post was published. I will respond to a few of your points:

I down voted him because of his abused on All the small accounts that he have Bullied.

Downvoting plagiarists and comment spammers is not bullying.

I don't know why @stellabelle @transisto @pfunk and other are Supporting this account @littleboy .

Their upvotes are a small portion of my rewards. It is a public blockchain. You can check for yourself. Most of my rewards come from utopian upvotes. I am an advisor to the utopian project and helped the project by contributing many ideas that were accepted and implemented. For example, the flag function in Utopian was added after I suggested that.

He behave very Badly , does not deserving to get any support from @anyone .

That's your personal opinion.

He can do it like self-upvotes , while others cannot.

Again, another opinion of yours.

If we let this sort of behaviour in #steemit , I tell you that the #steemit platform will be Doom!

I largely doubt anyone will believe you. But I think a lot of people will think having users who make false accusations against new projects like Utopian are capable of sinking steem to the Doom! You did that recently when you attacked Utopian.