In almost all cases given the current stake distribution most of the reward is from whale votes, but that does not mean that having 1250 followers or posting good photography doesn't matter.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
In almost all cases given the current stake distribution most of the reward is from whale votes, but that does not mean that having 1250 followers or posting good photography doesn't matter.
So is this a flaw in the system? Is Steemit sustainable long-term, without a more equalizing power and reward distribution? I assume the goal is for Steemit to grow and grow. For that goal to succeed I would imagine that there needs to be a way for the distribution of rewards to be more accessible for quality posts from people unseen by the whales.
Opinions differ.
I see that. and time will tell, and I'm sure those most passionate about the long-term growth and sustainability of Steemit will make changes as they become clearly needed.