Yep Ignore this post!
I made a better one here.
Redacted:
It's called a general strike.
If there are no people making content, Steem will lose value, and @mmmmkkkk311's investment in it will go to the gutters.
Redacted:
It's called a general strike.
If there are no people making content, Steem will lose value, and @mmmmkkkk311's investment in it will go to the gutters.
No, because that’s what that person wants. They are attacking communities, SBI, Palnet, and others and it’s done by bots and it’s attacking my quality posts.
Astrologically speaking! Not very profitable outcome for Steem!
This month has very strong astrological aspects, some astrologers here issued warnings to close clients to be on guard!
People will reap what they have sown! Karmic rules always operate imperceptibly.
I had a premonition that Steem will end!
I didn’t tell the whole story! LoL
There will be a drastic ending so that a new beginning can take place!
Uranus influences coupling with Saturn, with Jupiter in conjunction with Venus!
Also two eclipses within one month!
This is a recipe for explosive and highly charged situations! There will be death to the old worn out ways! It’s revolution time! For better or for worse!
There will be blood in the battle field!
Karmic!
I hope your premonition is not too accurate. Steem is valuable as is, but there need to be some restraints for people like @mmmmkkkk311 in place so they wouldn't just dictate to the rest of the community what to do or not.
Please stop refusing the rewards and we'll keep the counter-upvotes coming to keep your boat afloat. That's how disagreeable downvotes have been dealt with before.
I may do that, but I am not sure anymore I want to carry on posting on Steem.
You can post pictures of your lunch and Ninnu's rear after a session of self-wrestling in mud. Similar tactics were used by @acidyo when retaliatory DVs rained on him a few months ago.
I could use some help. Since I spoke out against him, he's been hitting me harder. Thanks
Did you notice that I'm downvoting vote buyers posts only?
There are hundreds (maybe thousands) of accounts with higher stake than mine. Any of them can destroy my account with a couple of clicks. Why they didn't do it yet? Maybe they see what I see. Next exit scam would be destructive for this blockchain.
We are missing something here. Guys who are pulling out from community hundreds of thousands STEEM should not run their businesses basing just on a PROMISE
Now that we are actually talking...
Could you see SBI working if they were to amend how the bot works somehow?
I understand that you are against people sponsoring other people on SBI, but that payment I think can also work as a statement of trust. It's not strictly a purchase, but an investment in that person. After all, if they do not post anything for 150 (?) days, his sponsorship will be dropped and distributed amongst the rest of the pool and they don't get anything for it. (That's how SBI works currently at least.)
There is also a black list and the people that are being sponsored are also being vetted against that list. Bots and scammers will not be admitted to the SBI pool. I think that is only a good thing.
I am thinking that as long as someone is handling the bot, we ultimately need to trust that person. But that's exactly how it works in any setting of life. If you can't trust someone, you just don't give your money to them, and if you do trust them and they run away with your money they will. We can never be quite certain which case it is.
But at least the service has been running for what 2 years (?) now, without anyone running away with the money.
Now the interesting part would be if we could employ smart contracts to run the SBI service for us. We could be absolutely certain that the rules are being followed by both the people providing the service (as there are none), and those who use it (sponsors and sponsees).
The way I see SBI affecting the Steem ecosystem is by flattening the rewards in a way that there are less and less those who make crazy huge sums of money, and less of those who make nothing. Everyone could make something, not too much, and not too little.
Yes I guess you would claim basic income would lead to people not creating any quality content, but I am contesting that point as I know it can also incentivize people to actually create content.
Your turn.
Right now SBI doesn't follow any #newsteem "unwritten rules" but it's not the end of the world. Learn about Communities and SMT, I'm sure you can move there SBI and you will be stronger than ever. Good Luck!
(I didn't notice this reply of yours, until now.)
I didn't really get what you said about SMTs. What I did hear is you were attacking the communities as well.
You didn't address the part where I mentioned the reward pool being more evenly distributed because SBI though. I believe this to be a good thing, and not as you say "raping the reward pool". It makes Steem more inviting to newcomers, because there won't be so many people getting huge rewards for mundane posts, and it also makes sure people won't get 0 rewards from quality posts.
Isn't that (more even distribution of rewards) exactly what we need?
I think you may be afraid that the Steem isn't going to be a lottery anymore if the SBI takes hold and the reward pool gets more evenly distributed to all.
Yes, you are right that we should not trust anyone running a bot, but thenagain should I trust You that you don't continue your crusades after this one is done? Would you not hold the community as a hostage if you deem some other thing that bothers you immoral?
How can I believe you are not just milking your downvote spree for your own ends?
After all, you yourself are one of the people you claim to be fighting against. I have no reason to believe in your promise that you will not start this charade again when convenient.
And I heard you about the targeting.
What's your viewpoint on Steem Basic Income?
@mmmmkkkk311, Lier. Look through all of the feeds and you will find multiple people who never bought into the program but were sponcered in and you still downvote them. LIER.
Maybe if you provided proof they would be here with you on your side but, as of yet, I little almost no one backing your crazy actions. You ignore conversations and run.
You're coming from a fear-based mindset. You're literally hurting yourself by hurting the content creators, like me, who produce their best work just about every time they come to this platform.
Have you checked out "Steem N' Roses: My Response to the Attacks on the SBI Community as a Whole?
Quit spamming.
lol :)
So we should stop using steemit to satisfy one dude? :)
I'm not sure what will satisfy him. Maybe nothing.
Good morning @gamer00
would you mind if I take few minutes of your time? (I hope I'm not asking this question to often ;)
Anyway .... together with few core members of project.hope team - we'te trying to promote our recent publication: an article explaining economy behind our non-profit community project build on STEEM blockchain.
Perhaps I could ask you to spare few minutes and check it out and share your feedback with me.
I would absolutely appreciate it a lot. I read all comments and I drop solid upvote on each valuable one.
Link: https://steemit.com/hive-175254/@project.hope/3-ways-of-joining-our-efforts-project-hope-economy-explained
Yours, Piotr
ahaha. if you fight with your own hands, you also can grab an axe and cut them off. or the tongue, if it lives its own life... effective strategy, isnt it?
The way I see it, if he is going to think curation is simply downvoting and coercing people to follow his own ideals, he is quickly going to notice there will be nothing to curate.
so true.
in my only comment to him, I described it the same way: downvoting authors (i.e. content creators) is like shooting into your own leg. he didnt responded, anyway..
!BEER
If only he communicated back when we respond to him.
still don't understand why he did that. Is downvote a special pleasure? did he feel satisfied after that? still wonder why there are people who enjoy being hated
He ultimately either wants Steem to fail, or doesn't understand he is doing more harm than good.
Any way, he is failing. He just downvoted two of my posts, and that means I am going to give some more sponsorships to new people. He can thank himself for that.
Hi, @gamer00!
You just got a 40.82% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.
Let him downvote my posts and use up his VP. What I make is not that important as I enjoy posting and commenting. What he is doing just looks like work to me. If people are posting junk just to get an SBI vote then I'll consider downvoting or reporting them. I've done it before.
Yeah, he can dv my comments too. Lol.
What he is doing is not work, he has bots working for him.
I know, but he also spends time commenting about it. Mind you, what am I doing right now? :)
And if there's a good post being downvoted just because it has an SBI vote, it should be upvoted.
Yeah but I don't post junk for SBI vote... and I get downvoted by him..unless it is junk and I am under some delusion of grandeur...
Its not junk. He just downvotes people with sbi shares. Normally not with a high %
He's not discriminating. I have nothing against good content earning, but I send my votes where they are needed most.
You are making far more than me on a post, so I don't think you can complain too much :)
I still dont understand how declining payouts help to fight him
I don't know, but he's talking to me at least.
Interesting :D
Well, the usage must be promoted. It’s gotta do much more than just rewarding curations instead they should look at directly competing with twitter.
Bro you are 😎💪💪
Wrong answer. You create more posts so his downvote gets spread across more posts and gets smaller.
@eSteemapp has problems with the
<strike>tag (it simply doesn't show the strikethrough in the text) so you may not notice that it's all redacted, there's also a link to a newer post with a change of plan.Thanks, I will check it out!
I heard about the war