Roe V Wade wouldn't be relevant in either of those scenarios. We already have different laws in different jurisdictions today - I can have weed in CO, I can't in neighboring states. Handled the same way. I tend to think this is one wrong that perhaps libertarianism simply cannot justly deal with and leave it alone.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Roe v. Wade, (i.e., when human life first takes place in the womb) would come down to state by state definitions. And that would take a priority measure in each new nation as a result of Adam Kokesh's "Split 50!" prescription. So bottom line, ms. PF, you will have to pick which new nation you will reside in. With 50 new countries, I'm sure you will find one to your liking, and be joyus in NEVER HAVING TO ARGUE ABOUT THIS ISSUE EVER AGAIN.