Hi papa-pepper! I would just like to say that I support your conclusions wholeheartedly, althought I think that instead of trying to support them by saying logical conclusion (the conclusion stating that abortions are moral) is stupid and that the non-logical conclusion (abortions are immoral) is the right one, I believe that the immorality of abortion can be justified logically. I would also like to say that you should beware of ocrdu, he seems to be a (very smart) troll. I recently posted an article about animal rights and voluntaryism, and his comment appeared to be the only one that seemed like he had an intelligent question/objection. Quickly the subject was changed into one of children's rights instead of animal rights, which I also tried to explain my position on (not fully, obviously, since I could write an entire post about children's rights), which he/she did not even attempt to understand, but just proceeded to argue about semantics, accused me of supporting retarded baby stomping, and said my thoughts were a "dead end". I decided not to continue explaining myself because I realized that he/she didn't care (I did have answers to his objections, I just thought that they would be wasted on him/her). If you would like for me to write a post on my postion on the rights of children/babies/the unborn, please respond - I don't know if my efforts would be appriciated or a waste of time.
Best regards,
Ethan from TheLibertyAdvocate.com